Public Health Article

Screening for skin cancer in adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Review Quality Rating: 7 (moderate)

Citation: Wernli KJ, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Pocobelli G, & Blasi PR. (2016). Screening for skin cancer in adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 316(4), 436-447.

Evidence Summary PubMed LinkOut


IMPORTANCE:Skin cancer, primarily melanoma, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force regarding clinical skin cancer screening among adults.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies published from January 1, 1995, through June 1, 2015, with surveillance through February 16, 2016.
STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years and older at general risk for skin cancer.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data were abstracted, and study quality was rated.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Melanoma incidence and mortality, harms from cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, and stage distribution.
RESULTS:No randomized clinical trials were identified. There was limited evidence on the association between skin cancer screening and mortality. A German ecologic study (n?=?360,288) found a decrease of 0.8 per 100,000 melanoma deaths in a region with population-based skin cancer screening compared with no change or slight increases in comparison regions. The number of excisions needed to detect 1 skin cancer from clinical visual skin examinations varied by age and sex; for example, 22 for women 65 years or older compared with 41 for women aged 20 to 34 years. In 2 studies of performing visual skin examination, sensitivity to detect melanoma was 40.2% and specificity was 86.1% when conducted by primary care physicians (n?=?16,383). Sensitivity was 49.0% and specificity was 97.6% when skin examinations were performed by dermatologists (n?=?7436). In a case-control study of melanoma (n?=?7586), cases diagnosed with thicker lesions (>0.75 mm) had an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) for receipt of a physician skin examination in the prior 3 years compared with controls. Eight cohort studies (n?=?236,485) demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the degree of disease involvement at diagnosis and melanoma mortality, regardless of the characterization of the stage or lesion thickness. Tumor thickness greater than 4.0 mm was associated with increased melanoma mortality compared with thinner lesions, and late stage at diagnosis was associated with increased all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Only limited evidence was identified for skin cancer screening, particularly regarding potential benefit of skin cancer screening on melanoma mortality. Future research on skin cancer screening should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of targeted screening in those considered to be at higher risk for skin cancer.


Adults (20-59 years), Adult's Health (men's health, women's health), Cancer, Health Care Setting, Hospital, Screening, Seniors (60+ years)

Register for free access to all Professional content

Want the latest in aging research? Sign up for our email alerts.

Support for the Portal is largely provided by the Labarge Optimal Aging Initiative. AGE-WELL is a contributing partner. Help us to continue to provide direct and easy access to evidence-based information on health and social conditions to help you stay healthy, active and engaged as you grow older. Donate Today.

© 2012 - 2020 McMaster University | 1280 Main Street West | Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8 | +1 905-525-9140 | Terms Of Use