McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Treatment of hepatitis C: a systematic review.



  • Kohli A
  • Shaffer A
  • Sherman A
  • Kottilil S
JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):631-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7085. (Review)
PMID: 25117132
Read abstract Read evidence summary
Disciplines
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Gastroenterology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • Infectious Disease
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects more than 185 million individuals worldwide. Twenty percent of patients chronically infected with HCV progress to cirrhosis. New, simpler therapeutics using direct-acting antivirals that target various stages of the HCV life cycle are in development to eradicate HCV without concomitant interferon.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize published evidence on safety, efficacy (measured by a sustained virologic response [SVR], which is the treatment goal of undetectable plasma HCV RNA 12 or 24 weeks after therapy completion), and tolerability of current US Food and Drug Administration-approved interferon-based regimens and oral interferon-free regimens used for treating HCV infection and coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV; to provide treatment recommendations for specialists and generalists based on published evidence.

EVIDENCE REVIEW: A literature search of Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Agricola, Cochrane Library, Cinahl Plus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Conference Papers Index, Gideon, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Oaister was conducted from January 1, 2009, to May 30, 2014. Publications describing phase 2, 3, and 4 studies evaluating the treatment of HCV were included. Forty-one studies involving 19,063 adult patients were included. Strength of clinical data and subsequent HCV treatment recommendations were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

FINDINGS: Patients infected with HCV genotype 1 represent 60% to 75% of HCV infections in the United States. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1 is more difficult to cure than genotype 2 or genotype 3. Patients with HCV genotype 1 should receive treatment with sofosbuvir + pegylated interferon + ribavirin because of the shorter duration of therapy and high rates of SVR (89%-90%). Simeprevir + pegylated interferon + ribavirin is an alternative for patients with HCV genotype 1 (SVR, 79%-86%). Patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3, representing 20% to 29% of US HCV infections, should receive therapy with sofosbuvir + ribavirin alone (SVR for genotype 2, 12 weeks' duration: 82%-93%; SVR for genotype 3, 24 weeks' duration, 80%-95%). Patients with HIV-HCV coinfection and patients with compensated cirrhosis (ie, cirrhosis but preserved synthetic liver function) should receive the same treatment as HCV-monoinfected patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: New, short-duration, simpler therapies result in high SVR rates for HCV-infected patients. In conjunction with increased screening for HCV as suggested by recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, availability of new therapies may lead to the treatment of many more people with chronic HCV infection.


Clinical Comments

Gastroenterology

This systematic review is limited to data regarding the ability of the newer agents to create sustained virologic responses (SVRs) and the side effects, but neglects to mention a number of disturbing facts about hepatitis C treatment. The introduction notes that only a small minority of infected patients will ever get into trouble, but fails to discuss the implications of that fact. SVRs are viewed as cures even though it is now well recognized that some individuals who develop them still go on to develop end-stage liver disease. The SVR is a surrogate outcome that has failed validation on several occasions (and has never been affirmatively validated in any scenario). The HALT-C trial reported an increased all-cause mortality in the recipients of pegylated interferon (compared with no treatment). The randomized trials of interferon that assessed clinical outcomes have failed to show any benefit. From an evidence-based perspective, hepatitis C treatment cannot be justified.

Gastroenterology

A rapidly evolving area, so rigorous and updated reviews are helpful.

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

Great review article with recommendations for treatment for the most common types of HCV infection found in the US. With 185 million cases, the article recommends primary care physicians take care of otherwise healthy non-HIV infected individuals. Given the above, this should be on the top of primary care physicians` reading lists!

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

Excellent review with new therapies highlighted.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register