McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Association between influenza vaccination and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.



  • Udell JA
  • Zawi R
  • Bhatt DL
  • Keshtkar-Jahromi M
  • Gaughran F
  • Phrommintikul A, et al.
JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1711-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279206. (Review)
PMID: 24150467
Read abstract Read evidence summary Read full text
Disciplines
  • Cardiology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Public Health
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Internal Medicine
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Among nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, recent influenzalike infection is associated with fatal and nonfatal atherothrombotic events.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if influenza vaccination is associated with prevention of cardiovascular events.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of MEDLINE (1946-August 2013), EMBASE (1947-August 2013), and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception-August 2013) for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing influenza vaccine vs placebo or control in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease, reporting cardiovascular outcomes either as efficacy or safety events.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators extracted data independently on trial design, baseline characteristics, outcomes, and safety events from published manuscripts and unpublished supplemental data. High-quality studies were considered those that described an appropriate method of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and completeness of follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Random-effects Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were derived for composite cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and individual cardiovascular events. Analyses were stratified by subgroups of patients with and without a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 1 year of randomization.

RESULTS: Five published and 1 unpublished randomized clinical trials of 6735 patients (mean age, 67 years; 51.3% women; 36.2% with a cardiac history; mean follow-up time, 7.9 months) were included. Influenza vaccine was associated with a lower risk of composite cardiovascular events (2.9% vs 4.7%; RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.86], P = .003) in published trials. A treatment interaction was detected between patients with (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.32-0.63]) and without (RR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55-1.61]) recent ACS (P for interaction = .02). Results were similar with the addition of unpublished data.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a meta-analysis of RCTs, the use of influenza vaccine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The greatest treatment effect was seen among the highest-risk patients with more active coronary disease. A large, adequately powered, multicenter trial is warranted to address these findings and assess individual cardiovascular end points.


Clinical Comments

Cardiology

Another reason to get a flu shot other than just to be a good citizen and decrease the pool of infected individuals! Impressive too that the benefits were in the sickest CV patients. It is concerning that total mortality was not lower in those vaccinated. A randomized trial is indicated.

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

Intriguing findings that the study authors believe should prompt further clinical trials. Given that the mechanism for benefit is not well understood, the results do not have any immediate impact on clinical practice.

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

This is a very newsworthy article. It may be difficult to get better data as the ethics of a randomized trial of flu vaccine will be problematic.

Internal Medicine

the influenza vaccine has been recommended for a very long time for various segments of the population and not simply those at higher cardiovascular risk. I certainly have had the impression that the vaccine is useful; though, not necessarily dramatically so. Therefore, I don't understand how a randomized placebo trial can be ethical, as opposed to comparing large numbers of subjects who elected either to receive or not receive vaccine.

Internal Medicine

I was not aware of the differential effect between those with and without acute symptoms.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register