McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.



  • Gross A
  • Kay TM
  • Paquin JP
  • Blanchette S
  • Lalonde P
  • Christie T, et al.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 28;1(1):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5. (Review)
PMID: 25629215
Read abstract Read evidence summary Read full text
Disciplines
  • Neurology
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 6/7
  • Rheumatology
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7
  • Special Interest - Pain -- Physician
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 4/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. Exercise is one treatment approach.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of exercises to improve pain, disability, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life and global perceived effect in adults with neck pain.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, MANTIS, ClinicalTrials.gov and three other computerized databases up to between January and May 2014 plus additional sources (reference checking, citation searching, contact with authors).

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single therapeutic exercise with a control for adults suffering from neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radiculopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted trial selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment and clinical relevance. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Meta-analyses were performed for relative risk and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after judging clinical and statistical heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials (2485 analyzed /3005 randomized participants) met our inclusion criteria.For acute neck pain only, no evidence was found.For chronic neck pain, moderate quality evidence supports 1) cervico-scapulothoracic and upper extremity strength training to improve pain of a moderate to large amount immediately post treatment [pooled SMD (SMDp) -0.71 (95% CI: -1.33 to -0.10)] and at short-term follow-up; 2) scapulothoracic and upper extremity endurance training for slight beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment and short-term follow-up; 3) combined cervical, shoulder and scapulothoracic strengthening and stretching exercises varied from a small to large magnitude of beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment [SMDp -0.33 (95% CI: -0.55 to -0.10)] and up to long-term follow-up and a medium magnitude of effect improving function at both immediate post treatment and at short-term follow-up [SMDp -0.45 (95%CI: -0.72 to -0.18)]; 4) cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening/stabilization exercises to improve pain and function at intermediate term [SMDp -14.90 (95% CI:-22.40 to -7.39)]; 5) Mindfulness exercises (Qigong) minimally improved function but not global perceived effect at short term. Low evidence suggests 1) breathing exercises; 2) general fitness training; 3) stretching alone; and 4) feedback exercises combined with pattern synchronization may not change pain or function at immediate post treatment to short-term follow-up. Very low evidence suggests neuromuscular eye-neck co-ordination/proprioceptive exercises may improve pain and function at short-term follow-up.For chronic cervicogenic headache, moderate quality evidence supports static-dynamic cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening/endurance exercises including pressure biofeedback immediate post treatment and probably improves pain, function and global perceived effect at long-term follow-up. Low grade evidence supports sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAG) exercises.For acute radiculopathy, low quality evidence suggests a small benefit for pain reduction at immediate post treatment with cervical stretch/strengthening/stabilization exercises.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No high quality evidence was found, indicating that there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of exercise for neck pain. Using specific strengthening exercises as a part of routine practice for chronic neck pain, cervicogenic headache and radiculopathy may be beneficial. Research showed the use of strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervico-scapulothoracic and shoulder may be beneficial in reducing pain and improving function. However, when only stretching exercises were used no beneficial effects may be expected. Future research should explore optimal dosage.


Clinical Comments

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)

Another example of a very large document from the Cochrane Collaboration that probably will not alter medical practice. This 240 odd page document focuses on the evidence to support exercises for mechanical neck disorders. The authors searched the literature and found 27 trials including 3005 randomised participants that met the inclusion criteria. The conclusions, like so many such documents from the Cochrane Colaboration, were that no high quality evidence was found suggesting that they could not really answer the question they asked. The data suggests that specific strengthening exercises as part of routine treatment for chronic neck pain, cervicogenic headache and radiculopathy may be beneficial. Strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervico-scapulothoracic and shoulder area may be beneficial in reducing pain and improving function. If only strengthening exercises are used, there are no beneficial effects. These underwhelming results are unlikely to change management.

Neurology

This review is very interesting. The systematic searching process and appraisal method are the strength of this review. This review showed that some exercise may benefit in reducing pain. There is not enough evidence for encouraging exercise for all patients in our daily practice. Further studies and reviews should be performed, in particular exercise type and the dose of the exercise.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

No high quality evidence was found, indicating that there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of exercise for neck pain.

Rheumatology

This is a review which takes a long time to review. This is another look at an analysis done by the same group in 2012 using another model of classification of intervention. For me, the clinically useful observation was potential benefit for cervicogenic headache.

Rheumatology

This is an important study as it makes clear that the influence on pain and function of optimally performed exercises for the neck is small and maybe not clinically relevant (less than 10 %); although, for individuals, it may make a difference. I do not expect a different conclusion in perfect studies.

Special Interest - Pain -- Physician

The quality of Cochrane reviews is always excellent. However, the knowledge is limited. What is missing is a link with effectiveness of these interventions on work retention or return to work. That makes the newsworthiness for my discipline limited.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register