+AA
Fr
McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Public Health Article

Echinacea for the prevention and treatment of upper respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis



Review Quality Rating: 8 (strong)

Citation: David S, & Cunningham R. (2019). Echinacea for the prevention and treatment of upper respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 44, 18-26.

Evidence Summary PubMed LinkOut

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Echinacea preparations are commonly used to prevent and treat upper respiratory tract infection.

OBJECTIVES: To assess current evidence for the safety and efficacy of echinacea containing preparations in preventing and treating upper respiratory tract infection.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CAB extracts, Web of Science, Cochrane DARE, clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP - 1980 to present day.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trials using an echinacea preparation to prevent or treat upper respiratory tract infections.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Participants who are otherwise healthy of any age and sex. We considered any echinacea containing preparation.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: We used the Cochrane collaborations tool for quality assessment of included studies and performed three meta-analyses; on the prevention, duration and safety of echinacea.

RESULTS: For the prevention of upper respiratory tract infection using echinacea we found a risk ratio of 0.78 [95% CI 0.68-0.88], for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection using echinacea we found a mean difference in average duration of -0.45 [95% 1.85-0.94] days, finally for the safety meta-analyses we found a risk ratio of 1.09 [95% CI 0.95-1.25].

LIMITATIONS: The limitations of our review include the clinical heterogeneity - for example many different preparations were tested, the risk of selective reporting, deviations from our protocol and lack of contact with study authors.

CONCLUSIONS: Our review presents evidence that echinacea might have a preventative effect on the incidence of upper respiratory tract infections but whether this effect is clinically meaningful is debatable. We did not find any evidence for an effect on the duration of upper respiratory tract infections. Regarding the safety of echinacea no risk is apparent in the short term at least. The strength of these conclusions is limited by the risk of selective reporting and methodological heterogeneity.

IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Based on the results of this review users of echinacea can be assured that echinacea preparations are safe to consume in the short term however they should not be confident that commercially available remedies are likely to shorten the duration or effectively prevent URTI. Researchers interested in the potential preventative effects of echinacea identified in this study should aim to increase the methodological strength of any further trials.

PROSPERO ID: CRD42018090783.


Keywords

Adolescents (13-19 years), Adults (20-59 years), Behaviour Modification (e.g., provision of item/tool, incentives, goal setting), Communicable Disease/Infection, Grade school aged (5-12 years), Home, Meta-analysis, Nutrition, Primary health care provider office (e.g., Public health nurse, dietitian, social worker), Seniors (60+ years)

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register
Want the latest in aging research? Sign up for our email alerts.
Subscribe

Support for the Portal is largely provided by the Labarge Optimal Aging Initiative. AGE-WELL is a contributing partner. Help us to continue to provide direct and easy access to evidence-based information on health and social conditions to help you stay healthy, active and engaged as you grow older. Donate Today.

© 2012 - 2020 McMaster University | 1280 Main Street West | Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8 | +1 905-525-9140 | Terms Of Use