What is an Evidence Summary?
Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide this
Personalized feedback increases the effectiveness of online weight loss programs
Sherrington A, Newham J, Bell R, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions providing personalized feedback for weight loss in overweight and obese adults Obes Rev. 2016; 17: 541-551.
Are Internet-delivered weight loss programs with personalized feedback more effective than other weight loss programs for overweight and obese adults?
With more adults accessing the internet, online weight loss programs delivered may be an alternative to traditional in-person programs to maximize convenience for the participant and reduce program costs. Previous reports have stated online weight loss programs are effective but it is not clear which aspects of these programs are most important for losing weight.
How the review was done
Researchers did a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials including 3547 overweight adults (body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m2).
Key features of the studies were:
- Internet-delivered weight loss programs with personalized feedback (via web-based messages or email) were delivered to participants over a range of 3 to 24 months.
- Participants’ body weight was measured at the program end as well as at 3, 6 and 12 (or more) month follow-up periods. Body fat, waist circumference and BMI were also measured.
- Measurements of study participants were compared to control groups who were on a wait list for the program, received printed information, and/or were directed to online weight loss resources without personal feedback.
Quality assessment of studies revealed that only 2 studies had a low risk of bias.
What the researchers found
Participants in internet weight loss programs with personalized feedback lost on average over 2kg more than those in control groups receiving no personalized feedback. These benefits were only shown at 3 to 6 months, however; at 12 months or longer there was not a significant difference in weight loss between people in the study groups vs control groups. Different programs also included different types of personalized feedback (eg. feedback on performance, information about consequences, self-monitoring, goal setting). There was too much variability to determine which types of feedback may be the most effective.
Internet-delivered weight loss programs that provide personalized feedback are more effective than programs that do not provide this type of support, especially in the short-term. Studies lasting more than 12 months or longer are needed to assess whether these types of programs lead to long-term weight loss.
A group that receives either no treatment or a standard treatment.
Advanced statistical methods contrasting and combining results from different studies.
Randomized controlled trials
Studies where people are assigned to one of the treatments purely by chance.
Risk of bias
Possibility of some systematic error in the studies.
A comprehensive evaluation of the available research evidence on a particular topic.
Related Evidence Summaries
Preventive Medicine (2017)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016)
JAMA Internal Medicine (2016)
Related Web Resources
Support, in the form of education and nicotine replacement therapy, can increase your chances of quitting smoking. Counselling and text message support via mobile phone is a promising way to manage nicotine cravings. More research is needed as technology options change.
There is some evidence that mobile health apps lead to healthier behavior, but they may also cause people to feel unnecessary anxiety about their health. There is no evidence that shows mobile health apps can be harmful.
UpToDate - patient information
A peak flow meter measures lung function and the severity of asthma symptoms. It is an inexpensive, easy way to monitor asthma symptoms at home. Regular measurements can help guide treatment. This website gives tips on how to use it.
DISCLAIMER These summaries are provided for informational purposes only. They are not a substitute for advice from your own health care professional. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal