+AA
Fr
Back
Evidence Summary

What is an Evidence Summary?

Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on

Got It, Hide this
  • Rating:

Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative programs show some promise to support older adults receiving home care

Sims-Gould J, Tong C, Wallis-Mayer L, et al.  Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review  Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2017; 18(8), 653-663.

Review question

  • Do reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative (4R) programs improve the quality of life for older adults receiving home-care services?

Background

  • Home care is a vital component of the preventive care required to allow older adults to live at home safely and comfortably.
  • As populations age, the demand for home care is increasing. Fewer healthcare workers are serving a greater number of elderly clients, and this reactive approach is simply not sustainable. Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative (4R) programs offer a solution by providing a holistic, evidence-based and economically sound approach to maintaining and improving functional capabilities of older adults.
  • The reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative programs are delivered by a team of professionals who aim to maximize independence with interventions focused on rehabilitative exercises, home modifications, task redesign, education regarding self-care, falls prevention and nutrition.
  • There is a need to identify effective home-care approaches by evaluating the quality of current services such as 4R programs that benefit the aging population.

How the review was done

  • A detailed search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies measuring the impact of 4R programs on community-dwelling older adults. There was no date restriction on the search.
  • A total of 853 studies were identified in searches, and 15 were included in the review after assessments for eligibility.
  • This review was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

What the researchers found

  • The 4R programs in this review focused on the well-being of older adults receiving care after being discharged from hospital, as well as on clients receiving care without a hospital stay. In general, the descriptions of interventions were limited. For example, most studies failed to include the type of staff training required to execute 4R programs.
  • Nevertheless, the review identified that 4R programs effectively reduce the amount of time that older clients need ongoing home care, due to their functional improvements and fewer restrictions on activity as a result of the interventions. As a result, 4R programs were shown to be cost-effective as the number of emergency-room visits and unplanned hospital stays among this population were reduced.

Conclusion

  • These 4R programs proved to be promising in supporting older adults receiving home care, in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Of all of the outcomes assessed, the 4R programs had the greatest impact on the mobility of older adults.
  • Further research is recommended to identify how 4R programs can be structured to optimize the rehabilitation of older adults in all settings, which will make the related research more generalizable.



Related Web Resources

DISCLAIMER These summaries are provided for informational purposes only. They are not a substitute for advice from your own health care professional. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the McMaster Optimal Aging Portal (info@mcmasteroptimalaging.org).

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register
Want the latest in aging research? Sign up for our email alerts.
Subscribe
© 2012 - 2017 McMaster University | 1280 Main Street West | Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8 | +1 905-525-9140 | Terms Of Use